A01 A02 A03 A04 A05 A06 A07 A09 A10 A11 A12 A13 A14 A18 A19 A21 F01 F02 INF Ö

A12 – Der Einfluss chronischer Entzündung auf die Furchtextinktion

Harald Engler, Sigrid Elsenbruch

Systemische Entzündung interferiert mit Lern- und Gedächtnisprozessen und könnte über Beeinträchtigung der Extinktion von Schmerz-assoziierter Furcht zur Pathophysiologie chronischer Schmerzen beitragen. In dem Projekt sollen die Effekte von akuter und chronischer Entzündung auf unterschiedliche Aspekte des Extinktionslernens untersucht werden. Dazu soll in Gesunden überprüft werden, ob es unter dem Einfluss einer Endotoxin-induzierten akuten Entzündungsreaktion zu Veränderungen in Extinktion und Reinstatement von konditionierter Schmerz-assoziierter Furcht kommt. Die Effekte von chronischer Entzündung auf die Furchtextinktion sollen bei Patienten mit chronisch-entzündlicher Darmerkrankung untersucht werden.

Leitfragen des Projekts A12:

  • Fördern systemische Entzündungsprozesse den Erwerb von schmerzbezogener Furcht?
  • Beeinträchtigt Entzündung das Extinktionslernen und fördert sie das Wiederkehren von schmerzbezogener Furcht?
  • Sind die Effekte von Entzündung auf exzitatorisches bzw. inhibitorisches Lernen spezifisch für Schmerz?
  • Ist das Extinktionslernen bei Patienten mit chronisch entzündlichen Darmerkrankungen beeinträchtigt?
Zurück zur Projektübersicht

Harald Engler

Projektleiter A12

Universität Duisburg-Essen

Sigrid Elsenbruch

Projektleiterin A10, A12

Ruhr-Universität Bochum

Franziska Labrenz

Postdoc A10, A12

Ruhr-Universität Bochum / Universität Duisburg-Essen

Hanna Öhlmann

Postdoc A12

Ruhr-Universität Bochum

Lena Nonnweiler

Doktorandin A12

Universität Duisburg-Essen

10 projektrelevante Publikationen

Benson S, Siebert C, Koenen LR, Engler H, Kleine-Borgmann J, Bingel U, Icenhour A, Elsenbruch S (2019) Cortisol affects pain sensitivity and pain-related emotional learning in experimental visceral but not somatic pain: a randomized controlled study in healthy men and women. Pain 160: 1719-1228. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001579

Benson S, Rebernik L, Pastoors D, Brinkhoff A, Wegner A, Elsenbruch S, Engler H (2020) Impact of acute inflammation on the extinction of aversive gut memories. Brain Behav Immun. 88: 294-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2020.06.009

Engler H, Brinkhoff A, Wilde B, Kribben A, Rohn H, Witzke O, Schedlowski M, Benson S (2023) Endotoxin-induced physiological and psychological sickness responses in healthy humans: insights into the post-acute phase. Neuroimmunomodulation. 30: 268-276. https://doi.org/10.1159/000534444

Koenen LR, Pawlik RJ, Icenhour A, Petrakova L, Forkmann K, Theysohn N, Engler H, Elsenbruch S (2021) Associative learning and extinction of conditioned threat predictors across sensory modalities. Commun Biol. 4: 553. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-02008-1

Labanski A, Langhorst J, Engler H, Elsenbruch S (2020) Stress and the brain-gut axis in functional and chronicinflammatory gastrointestinal diseases: A transdisciplinary challenge. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 111: 104501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2019.104501

Lanters LR, Öhlmann H, Langhorst J, Theysohn N, Engler H, Icenhour A, Elsenbruch S (2024) Disease-specific alterations in central fear network engagement during acquisition and extinction of conditioned interoceptive fear in inflammatory bowel disease. Mol Psychiatry. 29: 3527-3536. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-024-02612-7

Öhlmann H, Koenen LR, Labrenz F, Engler H, Theysohn N, Langhorst J, Elsenbruch S (2021) Altered brain structure in chronic visceral pain: specific differences in gray matter volume and associations with visceral symptoms and chronic stress. Front Neurol. 12: 733035. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.733035

Öhlmann H, Lanters LR, Theysohn N, Langhorst J, Engler H, Icenhour A, Elsenbruch S (2023). Distinct alterations in central pain processing of visceral and somatic pain in quiescent ulcerative colitis compared to irritable bowel syndrome and health. J Crohns Colitis. 17: 1639-1651. https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad080

Pawlik RJ, Petrakova L, Cueillette A, Krawczyk K, Theysohn N, Elsenbruch S, Engler H (2023) inflammation shapes neural processing of interoceptive fear predictors during extinction learning in healthy humans. Brain Behav Immun. 108: 328-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2022.12.010

Schmidt K, Schlitt F, Wiech K, Merz CJ, Kleine-Borgmann J, Wolf OT, Engler H, Forkmann K, Elsenbruch S, Bingel U (2024) Hydrocortisone differentially affects reinstatement of pain-related responses in patients with chronic back pain and healthy volunteers. J Pain. 25: 1082-1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2023.10.028

New Year, New Me: The Facts

As the calendar turns to a new year, millions of people around the world commit to New Year’s resolutions, making promises to use the new year as a fresh beginning and an opportunity for transformation. In 2024, almost three-quarters of the British population set themselves New Year’s resolutions — that’s around 40 million people (or the entire population of Canada). This tradition was particularly strong among younger generations, with 96% of Generation Z (aged 18-27) planning resolutions, compared to just 35% of the Silent Generation (aged 79+).

Most common new years resolutions:

  1. Saving more money (52%)
  2. Eat healthier (50%)
  3. Exercise more (48%)
  4. Lose weight (37%)
  5. Spend more time with family/friends (35%)

How long do most resolutions normally last before being broken?

  • Data from America (2016) shows that 75% of individuals maintain their resolutions through the first week. 
  • 64% of individuals maintain their resolutions through the first month. 
  • 46% of individuals in America keep their resolutions past the 6-month mark.

What makes resolutions stick?

Oscarsson et al. (2020) conducted research into what makes New Year’s resolutions stick. Biggest success rates depended on how people phrased their goals. Participants who set approach-oriented goals (trying to move toward or maintain a desirable outcome or state) than those with avoidance-oriented goals (trying to move toward or maintain a desirable outcome or state) were significantly more successful (58.9% vs. 47.1%) at sticking to their goals.

The study also investigates the effects of outside support. These participants received monthly follow-ups and emails with information and exercises for coping with hurdles when striving toward personal goals, and were also encouraged to set goals using the SMART technique and to set interim goals. The group that received some support was exclusively and significantly more successful compared to the groups who received a lot of support or no support at all. 

Additionally, you might feel more successful if you set goals that are measurable in numbers. While success for a person striving to quit smoking or lose weight could easily be measured in the number of cigarettes smoked or body mass index, the success for a person striving to „take better care of themselves“ could be highly subjective and possibly impossible to measure.

So as we enter 2026, let’s remember to work with our brain’s natural learning system: Frame your goals positively, break them into manageable steps, and celebrate small wins along the way.