A01 A02 A03 A04 A05 A06 A07 A09 A10 A11 A12 A13 A14 A18 A19 A21 F01 F02 INF Ö

Alumni Projects

Our project investigates why a memory sometimes returns after extinction but sometimes does not. This renewal effect can be caused by external causes, as a reaction to the personal history or also by internal causes, rooted in the process itself. As we know brain activation patterns for two regions for successful renewal, we can systematically test for potential reasons for renewal. On the one hand we look at the structure of participating brain regions, we look at what the influence of impaired attention through stress or medication is and how the salience of the learning context impacts behaviour.

Through the combination of noninvasive brain stimulation and imaging we can look at influences and interactions between brain regions and structures relevant for extinction during the renewal process.

Find out more on the project page >>

Even before the SFB 1280 started, the subprojects presented their research plans to a number of experts in a short video. 

By starting the video, you agree to YouTube’s data processing and cookies. Find out more in our privacy policy.

Even before the SFB 1280 started, the subprojects presented their research plans to a number of experts in a short video. 

By starting the video, you agree to YouTube’s data processing and cookies. Find out more in our privacy policy.

When a person or an animal is surprised, i.e. confronted with an event that deviates from our expectations, learning happens: expectations are adjusted to reality. We want to figure out how organisms integrate the diverse information from the environment into a model of their surroundings and then adjust their experiences, so that prediction errors no longer occur, as the model was brought into accordance with the reality. In our experiments we use a widespread theory, that is based on error correction. We are especially interested in which way errors are processed in extinction learning.

A negative prediction error dictates that an anticipated event does not occur. A positive prediction error describes an event that occurs unexpectedly. In our project we investigate how positive and negative predictions errors affect extinction learning.

Find out more on the project page >>

We research the development of extinction learning over the entire lifespan: from infancy, childhood, adolescence into young adulthood (18-22 years). Our experimental setups are designed so that subjects learn either to gain a pleasant reward or avoid an unpleasant situation. We compare how learning systems develop differently or similarly. We will follow extinction developmental transitions during brain maturation qualitatively and quantitatively. Also using developmental neuropsychological methods our project will apply findings from animal research to human research and create an important basis for future clinical applications for the first time.

Find out more on the project page >>

Even before the SFB 1280 started, the subprojects presented their research plans to a number of experts in a short video. 

By starting the video, you agree to YouTube’s data processing and cookies. Find out more in our privacy policy.

New Year, New Me: The Facts

As the calendar turns to a new year, millions of people around the world commit to New Year’s resolutions, making promises to use the new year as a fresh beginning and an opportunity for transformation. In 2024, almost three-quarters of the British population set themselves New Year’s resolutions — that’s around 40 million people (or the entire population of Canada). This tradition was particularly strong among younger generations, with 96% of Generation Z (aged 18-27) planning resolutions, compared to just 35% of the Silent Generation (aged 79+).

Most common new years resolutions:

  1. Saving more money (52%)
  2. Eat healthier (50%)
  3. Exercise more (48%)
  4. Lose weight (37%)
  5. Spend more time with family/friends (35%)

How long do most resolutions normally last before being broken?

  • Data from America (2016) shows that 75% of individuals maintain their resolutions through the first week. 
  • 64% of individuals maintain their resolutions through the first month. 
  • 46% of individuals in America keep their resolutions past the 6-month mark.

What makes resolutions stick?

Oscarsson et al. (2020) conducted research into what makes New Year’s resolutions stick. Biggest success rates depended on how people phrased their goals. Participants who set approach-oriented goals (trying to move toward or maintain a desirable outcome or state) than those with avoidance-oriented goals (trying to move toward or maintain a desirable outcome or state) were significantly more successful (58.9% vs. 47.1%) at sticking to their goals.

The study also investigates the effects of outside support. These participants received monthly follow-ups and emails with information and exercises for coping with hurdles when striving toward personal goals, and were also encouraged to set goals using the SMART technique and to set interim goals. The group that received some support was exclusively and significantly more successful compared to the groups who received a lot of support or no support at all. 

Additionally, you might feel more successful if you set goals that are measurable in numbers. While success for a person striving to quit smoking or lose weight could easily be measured in the number of cigarettes smoked or body mass index, the success for a person striving to “take better care of themselves” could be highly subjective and possibly impossible to measure.

So as we enter 2026, let’s remember to work with our brain’s natural learning system: Frame your goals positively, break them into manageable steps, and celebrate small wins along the way.