Cooperation with other Collaborative Research Centers, institutions and also individual scientists means exchange, new ideas and opportunities. We thank our partners for their fresh perspectives and excellent expertise. Our partners include:
The Berlin-Bochum Memory Alliance is a transregional collaborative initiative of four DFG-funded consortia. Its goal is to create synergies across consortia, by providing a platform for members to share ongoing memory research and to network. To this end, the alliance hosts joint events and supports self-organized initiatives by its early-career researchers. Find out more @ memory-alliance.de or click on the interactive logos.
Exchanging ideas with colleagues nationally and internationally is an important part of proper scientific conduct. Therefore we are happy to greet our regular guests at the SFB 1280, who in turn contribute with their expertise in specific projects and as advisors to the SFB as a whole. Fellows are integrated to a greater extent than visiting researchers. They are associated with the project over the long term and at least partially on site at the host institution. They remain in contact with the project network even after their stay.
Annemie van der Linden is one of the leading experts in the field of Animal MR. She will accompany the experiments in both A01 and A04, and support planned pilots in A07, A12, A18, A19, and A21. With her support we can realize our long-term plan to teach animal MR to projects that aren’t conducting MR yet. For this purpose, Annemie van der Linden will provide hands-on animal MR-courses at the University of Antwerp for our PhD students and postdocs. Annemie van der Linden will also be often in Bochum to help us to develop more advanced experimental imaging procedures. Taken together, this cooperation should importantly enhance our vison of Animal MR on two levels: First, Training young people in MR-compatible experiments and procedures as an extremely fast growing and important scientific technology with high relevance for the SFB. Second, Establishing the collaboration between Bochum and Antwerp.
Harald Lachnit is one of the most renowned researchers on learning and behavior. He contributed strongly to the birth idea of this research group and since the transformation of the Research Unit 1581 into the SFB 1280, he again had a formative function in the design of the learning theory foundation. For private reasons, he retired from active duty on March 31, 2021, contrary to earlier plans, and will no longer be available to the SFB 1280 in the second funding period. It is therefore extremely gratifying that he has agreed to continue advising the SFB as a Fellow. Against the background of 15 years of intensive cooperation in both joint projects, he is an ideal and invaluable advisor in the field of associative learning and thus an asset for the SFB and its individual projects.
The SFB 1280 has also appeared in other RUB editorial series, including
“On forgetting”- Oliver Wolf (A09): ‘Forgetting is not the same as forgetting’ (German) >>
“On forgetting” – Nikolai Axmacher (A02, A03, F02): ‘Genuine forgetting is rarer than we think’ (German) >>
“Under pressure”- Christian Merz (A09): ‘Remembering under stress’ (German) >>
RUBIN, the RUB’s science magazine, together with the SFB 1280, is publishing a new issue for anyone interested in forgetting in January 2025 – RUBIN Extinction Learning 2025. All articles printed in it will appear online in advance on the RUB news portal. We are very pleased to have this opportunity to present our research in a collected and condensed form.
Neuroscience – Adriane Icenhour (A10) & Franziska Labrenz (A10, A12): “The Second Brain in Our Gut” >>
Neuroscience – Dagmar Timmann (A05, F02) & Melanie Mark (A21): “The Conductor of Our Brain” >>
Immune System – Harald Engler (A12) & Martin Hadamitzky (A18): “The Sixth Sense” >>
Pain Memory – Ulrike Bingel (A11) & Katharina Schmidt (A11): “Why pain takes the fast lane when learning” >>
Neuropsychology – Nikolai Axmacher (A02) & Antoine Bouyeure (A02): “Why the spider in the cellar is more frightening than in the therapy room” >>
In Conversation – Sen Cheng (A14, F01) & Metin Üngör (F01): “Understanding the brain thanks to artificial intelligence” >>
Knowledge Bites – Onur Güntürkün (A01, F01): “Why Can You Learn About the Human Brain with Pigeons?” >>
Psychotherapy – Armin Zlomuzica (A13) & Marcella Woud (A13): “Looking Fear in the Eye” >>
Biopsychology – Roland Pusch (A01) & Onur Güntürkün (A01, F01): “A Small but Powerful Brain” >>
Point of view – Onur Güntürkün (A01, F01): „The Value of Curiosity“ >>
Neurobiology – Katharina Spoida (A07): “Switching Off Fear” >>
As the calendar turns to a new year, millions of people around the world commit to New Year’s resolutions, making promises to use the new year as a fresh beginning and an opportunity for transformation. In 2024, almost three-quarters of the British population set themselves New Year’s resolutions — that’s around 40 million people (or the entire population of Canada). This tradition was particularly strong among younger generations, with 96% of Generation Z (aged 18-27) planning resolutions, compared to just 35% of the Silent Generation (aged 79+).
Most common new years resolutions:
How long do most resolutions normally last before being broken?
What makes resolutions stick?
Oscarsson et al. (2020) conducted research into what makes New Year’s resolutions stick. Biggest success rates depended on how people phrased their goals. Participants who set approach-oriented goals (trying to move toward or maintain a desirable outcome or state) than those with avoidance-oriented goals (trying to move toward or maintain a desirable outcome or state) were significantly more successful (58.9% vs. 47.1%) at sticking to their goals.
The study also investigates the effects of outside support. These participants received monthly follow-ups and emails with information and exercises for coping with hurdles when striving toward personal goals, and were also encouraged to set goals using the SMART technique and to set interim goals. The group that received some support was exclusively and significantly more successful compared to the groups who received a lot of support or no support at all.
Additionally, you might feel more successful if you set goals that are measurable in numbers. While success for a person striving to quit smoking or lose weight could easily be measured in the number of cigarettes smoked or body mass index, the success for a person striving to “take better care of themselves” could be highly subjective and possibly impossible to measure.
So as we enter 2026, let’s remember to work with our brain’s natural learning system: Frame your goals positively, break them into manageable steps, and celebrate small wins along the way.