A01 A02 A03 A04 A05 A06 A07 A09 A10 A11 A12 A13 A14 A18 A19 A21 F01 F02 INF Ö

Our research – Core of the SFB 1280

6 billion neurons, interconnected billions of times. Plenty of space for the brain to anchor memories. Extinction learning is extremely complex; the SFB 1280 therefore has a clear concept for its research.

In the SFB 1280, 19 sub-projects are working on a central topic with a wide variety of questions: forgetting. All subprojects are guided by the SFB’s 8 overarching hypotheses.

Here you will find an overview of everything that is part of our research or has arisen from it – from our publications and collaborations to the technical equipment, our citizen science project “Menschen erzählen” and the research culture of the SFB 1280.

The hypotheses – Central questions

Does forgetting simply mean erasing old information? Does the extinction process differ depending on whether we forget something good or bad? What role does context play? And which areas of the brain form the extinction network in the first place?

All these and more are the central questions of the SFB 1280. 

The subprojects – Achieving great things together

Extinction learning is a wide-ranging and multifaceted topic that our subprojects address from a variety of perspectives. In animal models, in humans, in MRI scanners or by looking at hormonal interactions – the SFB 1280 is proud of its broad range of research methods.

The publications – Results of our work

Since 2017, the SFB 1280 has contributed to international research on the topic of forgetting with over 300 publications. With new findings from its own studies through to the exchange of perspectives in editorials, the SFB 1280 is a central component of research into extinction learning.

The infrastructure – Technology that makes research possible

As a supra-university and supra-regional research network, the SFB 1280 can rely on a wide range of hardware. In addition to 3T and 7T MRI and PET scanners, high-channel EEG caps and TMS systems, there is also access to high-performance microscopy equipment and material for influencing behavioral experiments.

The research culture – Sustainable work through Open Science

The correct handling of research data, a constant application orientation of our research, open science and the topic of animal experiments – all of this is particularly important to us in the SFB 1280. Central to this is the INF project, which deals with all matters relating to research meta-questions and the constant support of our researchers.

Cooperation – Exchange, integration and support

Even beyond the boundaries of the SFB, we are always interested in fresh ideas and new perspectives. We are happy about the input of our fellows, the regular meetings with our colleagues from the Berlin-Bochum Memory Alliance and are particularly proud of our cooperative citizen science project “Menschen erzählen” (People tell stories), which was developed in collaboration with the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz.

New Year, New Me: The Facts

As the calendar turns to a new year, millions of people around the world commit to New Year’s resolutions, making promises to use the new year as a fresh beginning and an opportunity for transformation. In 2024, almost three-quarters of the British population set themselves New Year’s resolutions — that’s around 40 million people (or the entire population of Canada). This tradition was particularly strong among younger generations, with 96% of Generation Z (aged 18-27) planning resolutions, compared to just 35% of the Silent Generation (aged 79+).

Most common new years resolutions:

  1. Saving more money (52%)
  2. Eat healthier (50%)
  3. Exercise more (48%)
  4. Lose weight (37%)
  5. Spend more time with family/friends (35%)

How long do most resolutions normally last before being broken?

  • Data from America (2016) shows that 75% of individuals maintain their resolutions through the first week. 
  • 64% of individuals maintain their resolutions through the first month. 
  • 46% of individuals in America keep their resolutions past the 6-month mark.

What makes resolutions stick?

Oscarsson et al. (2020) conducted research into what makes New Year’s resolutions stick. Biggest success rates depended on how people phrased their goals. Participants who set approach-oriented goals (trying to move toward or maintain a desirable outcome or state) than those with avoidance-oriented goals (trying to move toward or maintain a desirable outcome or state) were significantly more successful (58.9% vs. 47.1%) at sticking to their goals.

The study also investigates the effects of outside support. These participants received monthly follow-ups and emails with information and exercises for coping with hurdles when striving toward personal goals, and were also encouraged to set goals using the SMART technique and to set interim goals. The group that received some support was exclusively and significantly more successful compared to the groups who received a lot of support or no support at all. 

Additionally, you might feel more successful if you set goals that are measurable in numbers. While success for a person striving to quit smoking or lose weight could easily be measured in the number of cigarettes smoked or body mass index, the success for a person striving to “take better care of themselves” could be highly subjective and possibly impossible to measure.

So as we enter 2026, let’s remember to work with our brain’s natural learning system: Frame your goals positively, break them into manageable steps, and celebrate small wins along the way.