A01 A02 A03 A04 A05 A06 A07 A09 A10 A11 A12 A13 A14 A18 A19 A21 F01 F02 INF Ö

No Pills, more Skills (A13, A18)

The Adverse Effect of Hormonal Contraceptive Use on Exposure Therapy Benefit

A new Research Paper about the negative psychological impact of hormonal contraceptive was published by a research team around Friederike Raeder (Postdoc A13), Franziska Heidemann (PhD student A13), Manfred Schedlowski (Project Leader A18) , Jürgen Margraf (Project Leader A13) and Armin Zlomuzica (Project Leader A13).

Hormonal contraceptive use can aggravate existing symptoms of anxiety and depression and influence the response to pharmacologic treatment.

The impact of hormonal contraceptive use on non-pharmacological treatment efficacy in anxiety disorders is less well explored. Oral contraceptives, which suppress endogenous sex hormone secretion, can alter fear extinction learning. Fear extinction is considered the laboratory proxy of exposure therapy in anxiety disorders. This study set out to examine whether oral contraceptive use is related to exposure-based treatment response in specific phobia.

The research team recruited spider-phobic women (n = 28) using oral contraceptives (OC) and free-cycling women (n =26, No-OC). All participants were subjected to an identical in-vivo exposure. Exposure-based symptom improvement was assessed with several behavioral and subjective indices at pre-treatment, post-treatment and six-weeks follow-up. No–OC women showed higher pre-exposure fear levels on the FSQ and SPQ. OC women showed slightly less pronounced exposure benefit compared to their free-cycling counterparts (No-OC woman) as reflected by lower levels of fear reduction from pre-treatment to follow-up on the subjective level.

After correction for multiple testing, OC and No-OC women showed differences in self-report measures (SPQ, FAS and SBQ) from pre- to follow-up treatment but not from pre-to post-treatment. These findings implicate that oral contraceptive use can account for differential exposure-based fear symptom improvement.

The study highlights the importance of monitoring and managing hormonal contraceptives use in the context of non-pharmacological exposure-based interventions.

The way to the Research Paper >>

The way to the Press Release >>

Press Release as PDFDownload
Article BrightSurf.com as PDFDownload

New Year, New Me: The Facts

As the calendar turns to a new year, millions of people around the world commit to New Year’s resolutions, making promises to use the new year as a fresh beginning and an opportunity for transformation. In 2024, almost three-quarters of the British population set themselves New Year’s resolutions — that’s around 40 million people (or the entire population of Canada). This tradition was particularly strong among younger generations, with 96% of Generation Z (aged 18-27) planning resolutions, compared to just 35% of the Silent Generation (aged 79+).

Most common new years resolutions:

  1. Saving more money (52%)
  2. Eat healthier (50%)
  3. Exercise more (48%)
  4. Lose weight (37%)
  5. Spend more time with family/friends (35%)

How long do most resolutions normally last before being broken?

  • Data from America (2016) shows that 75% of individuals maintain their resolutions through the first week. 
  • 64% of individuals maintain their resolutions through the first month. 
  • 46% of individuals in America keep their resolutions past the 6-month mark.

What makes resolutions stick?

Oscarsson et al. (2020) conducted research into what makes New Year’s resolutions stick. Biggest success rates depended on how people phrased their goals. Participants who set approach-oriented goals (trying to move toward or maintain a desirable outcome or state) than those with avoidance-oriented goals (trying to move toward or maintain a desirable outcome or state) were significantly more successful (58.9% vs. 47.1%) at sticking to their goals.

The study also investigates the effects of outside support. These participants received monthly follow-ups and emails with information and exercises for coping with hurdles when striving toward personal goals, and were also encouraged to set goals using the SMART technique and to set interim goals. The group that received some support was exclusively and significantly more successful compared to the groups who received a lot of support or no support at all. 

Additionally, you might feel more successful if you set goals that are measurable in numbers. While success for a person striving to quit smoking or lose weight could easily be measured in the number of cigarettes smoked or body mass index, the success for a person striving to “take better care of themselves” could be highly subjective and possibly impossible to measure.

So as we enter 2026, let’s remember to work with our brain’s natural learning system: Frame your goals positively, break them into manageable steps, and celebrate small wins along the way.